| Salir de Aquí |

En Alemania

1999-2001 Refereeing Rules Amendments

Approved at the 2001 Munich Ordinary Congress

Note: The following IJF Refereeing Rules amendments were those policy decisions that were approved by the IJF Referee Commission from 1999 to 2001 and then ratified at the recent 2001 Munich Ordinary Congress. They include all rules changes made by the IJF Referee Commission after the 1999 Birmingham Ordinary Congress up to the 2001 Munich Ordinary Congress.

Manual scoreboard removal.  

The IJF Referee Commission recommends that we eliminate the Manual Scoreboards during all IJF Events. There should be Manual scoreboards available in case electronic scoreboards have a problem. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

Ladies menstrual cycle

The IJF Referee Commission recommends that a lady, who has blood on her pants, it will be dealt the same as tee shirt that has a rip for ladies. A lady Referee or by someone designated by the Organizing Committee, will escort the contestant to the private area and the competitor must change as quickly as possible. 2000 Rome March 25

Appreciation of scores starting on January 1st, 2002

The IJF Commission recommends that if there is a pause before the landing on the back, side, hip, etc. will be downgraded by one score. The principle is the same as tomoe-nage where there is a pause the maximum the score can be is waza-ari. This would come into effect on January 1st, 2002. 2001 July - Munich

Judogi Check.

The IJF Referee Commission recommends that judogi check will only be done for solution, blood, color, hygiene, thickness and hardness, and advertising. The tools to check the size of the judogi will be available for the competitor and coach, at the judogi check table. 2001 July - Munich

Once the competitor is on the contest area and the judogi is checked by the Referees and the judogi size does not conform to the regulations the contestant will be penalized with a DIRECT HANSOKU MAKE. This will be enforce as of January 1st, 2002 and will be used during the 2002 Junior World Championships. This Rule will be followed for the 2003 World Championships in Osaka, Japan. 2001 July - Munich

Article 27 (c) xxii to read :

a. To throw the opponent by winding one leg around the opponents leg is DIRECT HANSOKU MAKE. This will come into effect on January 1st, 2002. 2001 July - Munich.

The IJF Referee Commission recommends to change Article 27 (c) xxii to read:

a.  To throw the opponent by winding one leg around the opponents leg is DIRECT HANSOKU MAKE. This would come into effect on January 1st, 2002. 2001 July - Munich

GESTURE CHANGES

SHIDO - KUMI-KATA GESTURE

  • i) To intentionally avoid taking hold in order to prevent action in the contest. (Kumi-kata gesture)

    v)  In a standing position, to continually hold the opponent's sleeve end(s) for a defensive purpose (Generally within 3 to 5 seconds) or to grasp by "screwing up" the sleeve. (Kumi-kata gesture)

    vi) In a standing position, to continually keep the opponent's fingers of one or both hands interlocked, in order to prevent action in the contest. (Generally within 3 to 5 seconds). (Kumi-kata gesture)

    x) In a standing position to take any grip other than a "normal" grip without attacking. (Generally within 3 to 5 seconds). (Kumi-kata gesture)

    Taking a ¡°pistol grip at the bottom of the sleeve¡± and ¡°folding over the bottom of the sleeve end over¡± is a direct SHIDO. (Kumi-kata gesture).

  • SHIDO - NEGATIVE JUDO GESTURE

  • ii) To adopt in a standing position an excessively defensive posture. (Generally within 3 to 5 seconds). (Negative Judo gesture)

    iv) To stand, both feet completely within the danger zone UNLESS - beginning an attack, executing an attack, countering the opponent's attack or defending against the opponent's attack. (Generally 5 seconds). (Negative judo gesture).

    vii) To intentionally disarrange his own judogi or to untie or retie the belt or the trousers without the referee's permission. (Negative judo gesture)

    viii) To pull the opponent down in order to start ne-waza unless in accordance with Article 16. (Negative Judo gesture)

    ix) To insert a finger or fingers inside the opponent's sleeve or bottom of his trousers, or to grasp by "screwing up" his sleeve. (Negative Judo gesture)

    xiii)   To encircle the end of the belt or jacket around any part of the opponent's body. (Negative Judo gesture)

    xiv)  To take the judogi in the mouth. (Negative Judo gesture)

    xv)  To put a hand, arm, foot or leg directly on the opponent's face. (Negative Judo gesture)

    xvi) To put a foot or a leg in the opponent's belt, collar or lapel. (Negative Judo gesture)

  • SHIDOFALSE ATTACK GESTURE

  • iii)  To make an action designed to give the impression of an attack but which clearly shows that there was no intent to throw the opponent. (FALSE ATTACK gesture.)
  •  

     

    SHIDONON-COMBATIVITY GESTURE

  • xi) In a standing position, before or after kumi-kata has been established, not to make any attacking moves. (See Appendix NON-COMBATIVITY). (Non-Combativity gesture)
  •  

    CHUI STEPPING OUT GESTURE

  • vi)               From tachi-waza or ne-waza to go outside the contest area or intentionally force the opponent to go outside the contest area. (See Article 9 - "Exceptions"). (Stepping out gesture)
  • Kicking the opponent with no intent to throw or to set up the opponent is a penalty of Chui. 2001 July - Munich

    All the six (6) new gestures will be used as of January 1st, 2002. It will be used during the 2002 Junior World Championships followed by future World Championships. 2001 July - Munich

    Article 27 (x) Appendix remove the 1st paragraph.

    Taking a high grip on the opponent's collar is regarded as "normal" even if the hand is gripping on the opposite side of the opponent's jacket, providing the hand passes behind the opponent's head

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends eliminating this paragraph from the IJF Refereeing Rules since it is not normal kumi-kata under our new Refereeing Rules. 2001 February Budapest

    Long Hair  

     If long hair that is not tied properly and is a negative to the other competitor, and the Referee calls Matte to tie it proper the first time will be ¡°free¡±. Any time the Referee calls Matte to tie the hair it must be counted or after a Matte situation the time is extended because one of the competitors is adjusting the hair it must be counted. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    Kicking penalty.

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that kicking the opponent with no intent to throw or to set up the opponent is a penalty of ¡°chui¡±. For example: The Referees should look for actions such as one opponent trying an ashi-waza technique or to set-up the opponent, and the other opponent just kicks the other opponent on the shin(s), this will be a penalty of CHUI. 2001 February Budapest

    Excessive Pressure on the back.

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that if force or excessive pressure is put on the back area by an opponent, that the penalty is ¡°hansoku-make¡± according to Article 27 (d) xxviii. 2001 July Budapest

    Blue and White tape.

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that ¡°blue¡± and ¡°white¡± tape be put on the side of the contest area for the competitors on a trial basis in the World Championships in Munich. This will help the competitors come to the proper position to do the bow on and off the contest area. 2001 July - Budapest

    Difficult Situaions.

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that in ¡°difficult¡± situation (eg. where the Referee awards Yuko for Blue and the Judge indicates Wazari for White) the 3 Referee must meet and discuss the matter. The Referees may approach the Referee Commission table and ask their opinion. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    Medical.

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that tape can only be used by the doctor to cover the blood from either or both contestants, 2001 February Budapest

    Kumi-Kata  

    ¡°Normal Kumi-kata is taking hold with the left hand the opponents right side of the opponent¡¯ sleeve, collar, breast area, right top of the shoulder or back and with the right hand the left side of the opponent¡¯s sleeve, collar, breast area, left top of the shoulder or back above the belt¡±. 2001 February Budapest.  

    The IJF Refereeing Commission recommends that breaking a ¡°Kumi-Kata¡± quickly with ¡°pistol grip¡± or the ¡°folding the bottom of the sleeve end over¡±, and taking a kumi-kata¡±, is this a penalty of ¡°Shido¡±. 2001 February Budapest.  

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that if a contestant continues to take an abnormal kumi-kata, the time will be reduced from ¡°3 to 5 seconds¡±, to ¡°3 seconds¡±, and to a direct penalty of ¡°shido¡±. 2001 February Budapest.

    Eliminating Article 9

    ¡°Appendix¡± 2nd, & 5th paragraph since the Article section is clear.

    2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    Kata Guruma (On the knees)

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that Kata Guruma on the knees and falling directly back is Hansoku Make, the same as standing Kata Guruma. 2001 February Budapest.

    Article 17 (h) Change the wording to read:

    ¡°When a contestant performs or attempts to perform a kansetsu-waza or shime-waza from the standing position and the result with control is not sufficiently apparent.¡± 2001 February Budapest.

    Kata Guruma (Standing)

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that Kata Guruma on the knees and falling directly back is Hansoku Make, the same as standing Kata Guruma. 2001 February Budapest 

    Article 27 Changes

    Article 27 (a) vi – In a standing position, to continually keep the opponent¡¯s fingers of one or both hands interlocked, in order to prevent action in the contest. (Generally within 3 to 5 seconds). January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    Non-Combativity:

    Article 27 (a) xi – In a standing position, before or after kumi-kata has been established, not to make any attacking moves. (see Appendix NON-COMBATIVITY). 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    Article 27 - Keikoku penalties were reviewed.

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that Article 27 (c) xxvii, which reads, ¡°To make unnecessary calls, remarks, or gestures derogatory to the opponent or referee during the contest¡± will now become ¡°Hansoku Make¡± even after sore made. January 1st, 2001

    2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    One-sided grip situations?

    The IJF Referee Commission recommends that a one-sided grip is not ¡°normal or standard¡± and the competitor has 3 to 5 seconds to attack or the competitor will be penalized with ¡°shido¡±. January 1st, 2001

    2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

    Posture of contestants during the contest?

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that Article 27 (a) ii will be applied: ¡°To adopt in a standing position, after kumi-kata, an excessively defensive posture¡±, and the competitor must attack within 3 to 5 seconds or the competitor will be penalized with ¡°shido¡±. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Hooking one leg between the opponent¡¯s leg with no intent to throw.

  • The IJF Referee Commission agrees that this is not standard kumi-kata and the competitor must attack within 3 to 5 seconds or the competitor will be penalized with ¡°shido¡±. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Difficult Situations in the Contest.

  • a. It maybe necessary in some difficult situations where, which competitor should receive the score, the referee should point to the competitors corresponding tape (blue or white). January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul  

    b. For example, in a situation where one Judge gives an IPPON for one contestant (blue) and the Referee and other Judge give YUKO to the other contestant (white)), the 3 referee should meet to discuss the awarding of the score. January 1st, 2001. October 22-24th Nabeul

  • Special spray on hand to give additional grip, is this against the spirit of judo or fair play?

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that any type of spray or other solutions, to give an advantage over the opponent is strictly prohibited. Article 27 (d) xxviii Hansoku-Make, against the spirit of Judo. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Rubber brace on ankles.

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that any type of rubber braces or elastic bandages or other material that give an advantage to a competitor will be prohibited. The judogi control personnel must check the competitors during judogi control and the Referee are the final check prior to hajime. Article 27 (d) xxviii Hansoku-Make against the spirit of Judo. January 1st, 2001. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Control in terms of scissoring the legs from below in Osaekomi

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that scissoring from below like tate shiho gatame (feet/ankle) without loss of ¡°control¡± is not ¡°toketa¡±. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Tying of hair.

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that the competitors will be given one free time to retie their hair and the next time will be a penalty of ¡°shido¡±. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Normal or Standard Kumi Kata

  • The IJF Commission has agreed on ¡°Normal or Standard¡± kumi kata and any other grip, the competitor must attack within 3 to 5 seconds. Article 27 (a) (x). January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Kumi Kata

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that the present rule under Article 27 (a) i be used and to change the word hold to ¡°kumi-kata¡±.

    ¡°To intentionally avoid taking a kumi-kata in order to prevent action in the contest, the penalty is ¡°shido¡±. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul

  • Holding the bottom of the sleeve.

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that, holding the bottom of the sleeve by folding the sleeve end over will be a penalty of ¡°shido¡±. January 1st, 2001. 2000 October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Vomit types

  • Any type of vomit by the competitor will result in kiken gachi for the other competitor. Confirmed again in Rome – 2000 March #19
  • Kata-Guruma

  • The IJF Referee Commission agrees in ¡°Kata-Guruma¡±, with the competitor on the back, and throwing directly backwards, is ¡°HANSOKU MAKE¡±. This is a dangerous situation! 2000 Rome – March #28
  • Recording for medicals

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that on January 1st, 2001, anytime the Doctor is called to attend to an athlete it is recorded and the doctor has one minute to deal with this situation, with the Referees discretion. The only time it is not recorded is when the doctor is called for an illegal act by one of the competitors and now the doctor has more time and may treat the other competitor. 2000 Rome – March #27
  • Judogi must meet the standards of:

  • The Patton color of the judogi: blue color, according to the IJF pattern number.

    Maximum of one-centimeter thickness and 5-centimeter width, in the collar, a measuring device will be used from the bottom of the collar to around the neck and down to the bottom of the other side of the collar during judogi control. 2000 Rome – March #3.

  • What does largely on the back mean?

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that in the interpretation of IPPON, largely on the back means, more than 50% of the back. Rome – March 2000. #23
  • Standing juji gatame, as in jujitsu.

  • The article 16 and 17 should be applied in this situation. The IJF Referee Commission recommends that if the technique is not immediately apparent it must result in Matte. 2000 Rome – March #22
  • IJF RULES and REGULATIONS

    COMMISSION, REFEREES AND INTERPRETATIONS

    1999 TO 2001

    IJF Events

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that in the future the Referees must attend the Referee seminar prior to all IJF Events, otherwise the Referee will be disqualified from Refereeing. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • All finals to be observed by all IJF Referee Commission Members.

  • In future IJF Events, the IJF Referee Commission will all congregate in the area where the finals are being held to observe the contest. January 1st, 2001. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Additional Referees for the Spring seminar.

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that each Continental Union may add up to 2 Referees, that are properly roistered, to the IJF Spring seminar. All expenses will be paid by the Continental union or the participant. 2001 July Munich.
  • Grading of Referees during a World Championships to ¡°B¡±. (B, B1, B2)

  • 3 categories:
  • ¡¤        B Olympic roistered

    ¡¤        B1 World championship roister

    ¡¤        B2 Junior world championship roister

  • This IJF Referee Commission recommends that the previous meeting be adjusted to make the correction in the procedure to the grading of the Referees. Rome – March 2000. #4

    Exceptional Lady Referees

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that an exceptional lady Referee, that has been identified during the ladies seminar, and that has a Continental License maybe be fast tracked for International examination on a case by case basis. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Ladies Seminar Selection.

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that the selection of Referees for the Ladies seminar, be given to the roistered Olympic and World Championship lady Referees. The exception will be if they have gone to the IJF Spring Annual Referee Seminar. 2001 July Munich
  • 2004 Olympic Games

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that for the 2004 Olympic Games in Greece the number of Referee must be increased from 24 to 30. This would allow the IJF Referee Commission to have more flexibility in the selection of Referees plus this would allow the Commission to suspend some of the Referees whose performance is unacceptable. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • 2001 Seminar

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that each Continental Union must select the Referees for next years seminar, that are on the Olympic or World Championship roster list and have a potential to Referee in the 2004 Olympics in Greece. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • 4 Year Program for Referees.

  • The IJF Referee Commission has developed a 4-year program, like the athletes, to ensure that the Referees have a program, leading up to the 2004 Olympic Games. This program should be a model for Continents that have few high level competitions for the referees to develop and to keep sharp and up-to-date.

    2001

  • 1.     The Referee must come to the IJF Sponsored 2001 spring seminar and tournament.

    2.     The Referee must referee in their 2001 Continental Championships.

    3.     The Referee must referee in the 2001 World Championships in Munich, Germany.

    4.     The Referee must Referee in 2 other high level competitions in 2001 outside their Continent except Continents that have major high level tournaments.

    5.     The Referees must also referee in as many tournaments in their Country and Region as possible.

    6.     The referees must get evaluation and critiques at each tournament.

  • 2002

  • 7.     The Referee must come to the IJF Sponsored 2002 spring seminar and tournament.

    8.     The Referee must referee in their 2002 Continental Championships.

    9.     The Referee must referee in the 2002 Junior World Championships, except Continents that have major high level tournaments.

    10. The Referee must Referee in 2 other high level competitions in 2002 outside their Continent, except Continents that have major high level tournaments.

    11. The Referees must also referee in as many tournaments in their Country and Region as possible.

    12. The referees must get evaluation and critiques at each tournament.

  • 2003

  • 13. The Referee must come to the IJF Sponsored 2003 spring seminar and tournament.

    14. The Referee must referee in their 2003 Continental Championships.

    15. The Referee must referee in the 2003 World Championships in Osaka, Japan.

    16. The Referee must Referee in 2 other high level competitions in 2003 outside their Continent, except Continents that have major high level tournaments.

    17. The Referees must also referee in as many tournaments in their Country and Region as possible.

    18. The referees must get evaluation and critiques at each tournament.

  • 2004

  • 19. The Referee must come to the IJF Sponsored 2004 spring seminar and tournament.

    20. The Referee must referee in their 2004 Continental Championships.

    21. The Referee must Referee in 2 other high level competitions in 2004 outside their Continent, prior to the Olympic Games except Continents that have major high level tournaments.

    22. The Referees must referee in as many tournaments in their Country and Region as possible leading up to the Olympic Games.

    23. The referees must get evaluation and critiques at each tournament.

  • October 22-24th Nabeul

  • Computer to Select Referees.

  • The IJF Referee Commission will be experimenting on a computerized system for the selection of Referees during the tournament. The IJF Referee Commission would select the pool finals and medal contests since they will be able to select the best referees from that day¡¯s performance. By using the computerized system for the selection of referees this would allow the Referee Commission members to concentrate on the contest and to help the referees. The goal is to have this system approved and ready for use during the 2004 Olympic Games in Greece. October 22-24th Nabeul
  • Installation of lights for coaches.

  • The IJF Referee Commission recommends that the Organizing Committee of the World Events and Olympics Games must install colored lights (one bulb yellow and one bulb red, for each blue and white competitor), at each Referee and Sports Commission table. If either light goes on, the Referee must call ¡°Matte¡± and draw the attention of the ¡°coach¡± in question to the Commission table. 2001 February Budapest.
  • The refereeing commission discussed concerns over false attacks with kata guruma from the knees, the commission felt that referees are not looking closely enough at what is really an attack. It decided that the decision should come down to the feel of the referees and they should penalise negative situations.

    The commission discussed the rules regarding the danger zone, it discussed changing the rule from two feet in the danger zone for five seconds to one foot in the danger zone for the same amount of time. However it was decided that the rule should remain the same considering the size of the contest area has recently been reduced from 10 to 8

    The commission proposed that in future refereeing seminars each continent can bring reserve delegate at the IJF's expense there will also be places for two more referees on a roster basis from each continental delegation at the continents' expense.

    The commission further reviewed the scoring system to find greater consistency in awarding ippon

    The refereeing commission finalised plans to reduce the number of penalty gestures to six in total for the future. These will be for kumi kata, false attacking, non combativity, negativity, stepping out and kicking. This has been a goal since 1997 and was finalised to help simplify judo for the viewing public

    The commission agreed that as of January 1, 2002 referees will no longer ckeck judogi for size, this will now be the responsibility of the athletes, checks will still be made for foreign solutions, hygiene, colour, thickness, texture and advertising. athletes who come on to the contest area whose judogi are not the right size will be punished with hansoku make.

    The refereeing commission joined the education comision to agree a new rule for kawazugake it was agreed that attacks by winding one leg around the opponents leg should be punishable by hansoku make rather than keikoku, defending with such a technique will still be permitted, however

    The commission discussed being more consistent on the rules regarding scores, it was decided that there should be more effort to follow the statutes regarding the ippon score as it is felt that too many throws are awarded ippon that don't warrant it It was proposed that if there is a pause in technique when a throw is being attempted the score should be downgraded, this is to attempt to keep ippon score more dynamic therefore non fluid tecniques will no longer be able to score ippon

    La comisión arbitral discutió situaciones concernientes a los ataques falsos con la realización del kata guruma de rodillas, la comisión sentía que los árbitros no están mirando bastante estrechamente lo que realmente es un ataque. Decidió que la decisión debe reducirse a la percepción de los árbitros y ellos deben castigar situaciones negativas.

    La comisión discutió las reglas con respecto a la zona de peligro, discutió cambiando la regla de dos pies en el peligro durante cinco segundos a un pie en la zona de peligro para la misma cantidad de tiempo. Sin embargo fue decidido que la regla debe permanecer el mismo considerado el tamaño del área del concurso ha estado recientemente reducido de 10 a 8

    La comisión propuso cuando en un futuro existan seminarios de arbitraje cada continente puede traer a delegado utilizando la reserva del gasto de IJF habrá también lugares para dos más árbitros en una base de la lista de cada comisión continental con cargo a las mismas.

    La comisión repasó el sistema de mas del 51% para encontrar una mayor consistencia otorgando ippon

    La comisión arbitral finalizó planes para reducir el número de gestos de la multa a seis en total para el futuro. Éstos serán para el kata del kumi, falso ataque, no combatividad, negatividad, saliendo del área y dando de puntapiés. Ésta ha sido una meta desde 1997 y ha finalizado para ayudar simplifique el judo para el público que lo está viendo

    La comisión estaba de acuerdo eso a partir del 1 de enero, 2002 árbitros no hagan ningún judogi del ckeck más largo para el tamaño del mismo , ésta será ahora la responsabilidad de los atletas, todavía se harán cheques para géneros, higiene, el color, espesor, la textura y progaganda. se castigarán atletas que vengan al área del combate cuyos judogis no son el tamaño correcto con hansoku make.

    La comisión arbitral se unió a la comisión de educación para estar de acuerdo una nueva regla para el kawazugake el propósito era estar de acuerdo que los ataques enrollando una pierna alrededor de la pierna de los antagonistas deben ser castigables por hansoku haga en lugar del keikoku, defendiendo con semejante técnica todavía se permitirá, sin embargo

    La comisión discutió siendo más consistente en las reglas con respecto a las puntuaciones, fue decidido que debe haber más esfuerzo para seguir los estatutos con respecto al ippon debido a que se siente que se otorgan demasiadas puntuaciones de ippon que no son, fue propuesto que si hay una pausa en el desarrollo de una técnica que cuando un tiro está intentándose que la puntuación debe degradarse, la finalidad es intentar evaluar un ippon más dinámico por consiguiente no los técnicas que no sean fluídas ya no podrán anotar ippon

    Regresar Arriba